Friday, March 10, 2006

Peter van Bergeijk to publicly "criticise" me (in Dutch)

Seemingly some Dutch economists in Holland - who don't necessarily know me- are suddenly very concerned about my spending too much time on the internet (TRUE- but nothing to do about this, I have to be in touch with what happens in the world) and particularly about my apparently doing everything (read: putting too much effort and energy to the expense of my research time) to promote my website in the top most visited pages within the category "economie-nederland" on webstats4u (WRONG- the fact that webstats4u does not have a mechanism to block your own visits is nothing to blame on me- I decided nonetheless not to use my webpage as browser homepage anylonger, just to satisfy these criticisms and to show that I could not care less if I were in the top of the most visited economics pages in the Netherlands or not...).

While thanking Prof. Bergeijk for his concern and advice (always welcome!- I want to believe that his concern is not simply related to the fact that his own blog is competing for a top place as most visited pages in the aforementioned category on webstats4u), I'd like to point out that he might have been too jumpy in his criticism... and superficial analysis is not something economists should often employ- while unfortunately enough, lots of them do. I trust Peter van Bergeijk is not part of this latter category, though this entry in his "enonomendagboek" can't be counted as support for that.
Ah, almost forgot: I think this ad-hoc critic doesn't like very much the pictures on my site either... well, what can I say... too bad Mr. Bergeijk, would be utopian from me to hope satisfying everybody...

3 comments:

Sebi Buhai said...

Meanwhile, driven by curiosity I find out the following-
as for who is "zielig" (tough words, tough words, that remain in memory)... here we go- excerpts from the visits to my critic's page (and now the reasons for his attack become more visible). LOL...

4. 10 maart 00:13 Planet Internet, Nederland
5. 10 maart 07:34 Planet Internet, Nederland
6. 10 maart 07:51 Planet Internet, Nederland
7. 10 maart 09:43 Planet Internet, Nederland
8. 10 maart 09:45 Planet Internet, Nederland
9. 10 maart 09:52 Planet Internet, Nederland
10. 10 maart 09:59 Planet Internet, Nederland
11. 10 maart 11:44 Planet Internet, Nederland
12. 10 maart 11:57 Planet Internet, Nederland
13. 10 maart 12:02 Planet Internet, Nederland
14. 10 maart 12:12 Planet Internet, Nederland
...
18. 10 maart 13:18 Planet Internet, Nederland
...
23. 10 maart 14:58 Planet Internet, Nederland
24. 10 maart 15:08 Planet Internet, Nederland
...
26. 10 maart 15:19 Planet Internet, Nederland
27. 10 maart 15:23 Planet Internet, Nederland
28. 10 maart 15:24 Planet Internet, Nederland
...
30. 10 maart 15:30 Planet Internet, Nederland
...
32. 10 maart 15:41 Planet Internet, Nederland
33. 10 maart 16:01 Planet Internet, Nederland
...
35. 10 maart 16:19 Planet Internet, Nederland
36. 10 maart 16:33 Planet Internet, Nederland
...
41. 10 maart 17:17 Planet Internet, Nederland
...
45. 10 maart 18:44 Planet Internet, Nederland
46. 10 maart 19:25 Planet Internet, Nederland
47. 10 maart 19:43 Planet Internet, Nederland
48. 10 maart 19:53 Planet Internet, Nederland
49. 10 maart 20:03 Planet Internet, Nederland
50. 10 maart 20:53 Planet Internet, Nederland

For those that try to argument that Planet Nederland has thousands subscribers... so does the University of Copenhagen domain to which are connected also universities in Denmark outside Copenhagen. Once again, LOL, dear Prof. Bergeijk...

Anonymous said...

LOL inderdaad. Echt zielig van onze Peter. Kirsten

Sebi Buhai said...

It's not so much that he display this pathetic behaviour c (ie. zielig, cf. Kirsten), he apparently also refuses to approuve my comment to his article. Fortunately links to entry blogs (within other blogs) work without his approuval.

Once again it seems we deal with one of those economists that take simple correlations (strenghtened by their own behavior, though this is not proof) as causal relationships. Too bad. Prof. van Bergeijk is not however the first one- and unfortunately he won't probably be the last one.

BTW, this all reminds me somewhat of what some call Bentley's second law of economics: the only thing more dangerous than an economist is an amateur economist. Particularly when he is not responsible for his statements, I would add. Oh, well, I give up wasting my time and I hope Mr. Bergeijk will learn something- anything- for his new "attacks". Back to research (and not "ahum...").